🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together centers on individuals seeking fresh starts, struggling to escape addictions or abusive marriages, only to find hope curdling into violence. The author repeatedly invokes the phrase "new beginning", transforming it into willfully cynical through constant reiteration. Examples include "He could make a fresh start" and "They chose to begin anew" are scattered across the story. And yet, Kraus herself appears to be undertaking her personal new beginning, because this presents as a different type of work – observational, genuinely novelistic. Yet it turns out to be packed with the familiar conflicts and aesthetics as her previous works.

From Accidental Writer to Iconic Work

Chris Kraus started out as an creative who transitioned to writing unintentionally with her 1997 groundbreaking book I Love Dick, structured as missives to a distant beloved, converting personal female narrative from abjection into defiance. She continued writing, but the three subsequent engaging and challenging novels missed the shock and immediacy that the epistolary style infused into the voice of I Love Dick. Compounding this was her role as a maverick maker who had evolved into a large-scale low-rent landlord, so there was much discussion on real estate deals. It is logical that she now wants to explore fresh narrative sources, looking outwards to the experiences of others, at a moment when she claims that Trumpian politics turns intimate literature obsolete.

Several Eras, One Unescapable Past

The Four Spent the Day Together is organized into a trio of segments, encompassing multiple eras – each trapped by their histories. We encounter the story of a couple named Emma and Jasper, versions of Kraus's parents, moving from the Bronx to a pastoral setting. Additionally the account of Kraus, in the character of Catt Greene, confronting the delayed acclaim of I Love Dick, the ascent of a political figure, and her substance-dependent spouse a man named Paul. Finally the story of the murder of one lost young man by another in a community long abandoned by liberal ideals only a short distance from the protagonist's home in rural Minnesota.

From my perspective as a reader fond of honed writing of the sort Kraus often avoids, I was captivated by the novelistic voice of the opening part.

As a reader drawn to honed writing of the variety that Kraus herself usually avoids, I was captivated by the novelistic voice of the first section. It possesses a new quality of attentiveness that allows space for minutiae, like the pail that the protagonist as a child dislodges from ice at the opening of the book, assisted by her adored dad. "I found an ice toy!" she says; "a nice toy", he answers, "the nuanced interpretations of terms tumbling in their mouths like piece candy". She tells Emma's narrative with curiosity and intimacy. "It seemed to Emma she had entered a dream – not hers, exactly."

Letdown and Fragmentation

I was fated to feel let down when I hoped this new voice could last out the book. Kraus says here that she resents the pleasure audiences such as myself have taken from I Love Dick; she's committed to fragmentation, to the untidy aesthetics she has in common with her idol Kathy Acker, and the void and recurrence of her previous novels returns in the central part. Catt Greene is working on refurbishing 36 run-down apartments in the city's most challenging districts while moving between Minnesota and LA, unsuccessful in assisting Paul control his drinking. She feels helpless as Paul cycles through poorly supported positions as an substance abuse counselor in a society fueled by the hostility and dread that drives Trump's victory. A significant portion discusses about Catt being cancelled on Twitter, her listed profession modified from "novelist" to "landlord" on Wikipedia. She still gives the impression to care a little too much about this. At one point she says that she's researching the homicide so that before departing the state, "she could potentially understand something about an America that her social media opponents would not understand, would not even perceive".

The Killing Story

Then we reach to the actual killing – and the eponymous day passed by the deceased with the perpetrator and his associates. The author possesses compelling foundational content, and details moment by moment what occurred as Brandon came to meet Brittney after encountering her on a platform where she sold sex pictures. He anticipated intimacy but seems affably to have spent the day alongside her friends, loitering having his vehicle repaired and covering the cost of food and substances, before being killed by gunfire by Brittney's boyfriend Micah – a individual with mental health challenges who has often been institutionalized for aggressive outbursts.

Obsession and Unfinished Business

The protagonist becomes fixated by the account, and I found myself captivated by the way that the author's conflicting impulses towards responsible documentation and reckless transgression clash in this segment. But I'd have liked her to explore more thoroughly her individual preoccupations here. The standout figure is the character Brittney, who gains dimension partially because of Catt's identification with her – another bright, bullied girl spiraling out of control in a difficult, overlooked locality. Kraus notes that Catt converses with Brittney in detention, but she omits the dramatization of these talks. This entire part feels oddly unfinished, to the extent that her narrative ends almost mid-par